Billions in Middle East donations to U.S. universities linked to campus antisemitism

The identical U.S. universities that more and more are seen as breeding grounds for antisemitism have taken billions in beforehand undisclosed donations from the Middle East — and their critics don’t consider in coincidences.

The Lawfare Project filed a lawsuit this week on behalf of former Carnegie Mellon University pupil Yael Canaan, saying she was topic to “pervasive anti-Jewish discrimination” and tying her allegations to the half-billion {dollars} acquired by the college since 2021 from Qatar.

“Carnegie Mellon happens to be one of the largest recipients of Qatari money,” stated the Lawfare Project, which works with the web motion End Jew Hatred. “The question one must ask is, what is the money being used for?”



Concerns concerning the affect of overseas cash in academia for years have centered on China and its Confucius Institutes, however that was earlier than widespread anti-Israel protests broke out on school campuses following the Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist assault on Israeli civilians.

Recent stories of Middle Eastern nations funneling billions into greater schooling prompted the House final week to cross bipartisan laws toughening up monetary reporting necessities, regardless of the objections of the American Council on Education, which stated the invoice would curtail worldwide analysis in addition to cultural and educational exchanges.

Harvard President Claudine Gay insisted finally week’s House Education Committee listening to that the college has “strict policies” on which items and contracts it accepts and that donors don’t affect its insurance policies. Advocates for Jewish college students on campus had been skeptical.

“No matter what the universities say, it is hard to imagine that foreign entities are pouring vast amounts into American institutions and not expecting that they will receive something in exchange,” Kenneth Marcus, president of the Brandeis Center, instructed The Washington Times. “What they want is influence.”

Those worries accelerated after the Network Contagion Research Institute launched an explosive report final month exhibiting that universities reported greater than $13 billion in Section 117 items, or these acquired from overseas sources, for the five-year interval ending in 2019.

Many of these donations weren’t reported till the Trump administration prodded universities to replace their Section 117 filings within the aftermath of a 2019 report back to the Justice Department by the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy on its “Follow the Money” mission.

“The project revealed, for the first time, the existence of substantial Middle Eastern funding (primarily from Qatar) to U.S. universities that had not been reported to the Department of Education (DoED), as required by law,” stated the institute in its Nov. 6 report, “The Corruption of the American Mind.”

The checklist of overseas donors from 2014-19 was topped by Qatar, at $2.7 billion; adopted by England, at $1.4 billion; China, at $1.7 billion; and Saudi Arabia, at $947 million.

Carnegie Mellon was the main recipient, with $1.47 billion; then Cornell University, which acquired $1.3 billion; Harvard, which took $894 million; the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, with $859 million; Texas A&M, with $521 million; and Yale, which acquired $495 million.

The report went a step additional by campus antisemitism, concluding that from 2015 to 2020, universities that had accepted items from Middle Eastern donors noticed on common “300% more antisemitic incidents than those institutions that did not.”

Not solely that, however campaigns to censor audio system and students had been additionally extra prevalent on the universities receiving help from the Middle Eastern regimes.

The report concluded {that a} “massive influx of foreign donations to American institutions of higher learning, much of it concealed and from authoritarian regimes, with notable support from Middle Eastern sources, reflects or supports heightened levels of intolerance towards Jews, open inquiry, and free expression,” stated the report.

The National Association of Scholars reported final 12 months that Qatar had turn out to be a “major donor to U.S. universities,” contributing at the least $4.7 billion from 2001 to 2021.

In her lawsuit, Ms. Canaan stated she was subjected to a “cruel campaign of antisemitic abuse” at Carnegie Mellon, together with a professor who stated she ought to focus her studio mission on “what Jews do to make themselves such a hated group.”

Carnegie Mellon stated that it’s evaluating the lawsuit, which was filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

“We are steadfast in our commitment to create and nurture a welcoming, inclusive and supportive environment where all students can reach their potential and thrive,” a spokesperson for Carnegie Mellon instructed The Washington Times. “We take any allegations of mistreatment or harassment seriously.”

A query of affect

Ms. Gay defended the foreign-based giving on the House Education and the Workforce Committee’s Dec. 5 listening to on campus antisemitism, saying that Harvard is cautious to not settle for donations from sources on restricted lists.

“We go further and only accept gifts that align with our mission and provide autonomy for research and faculty,” Ms. Gay stated. “We have alumni all over the world and their philanthropy supports student aid and scholarships and cutting-edge research.”

She additionally denied that the funding has any affect on Harvard’s decision-making when requested why the college permits the pro-Hamas group Students for Justice in Palestine to stay on campus. Hamas has been designated a terrorist group by the State Department.

“Our donors do not influence how we run the university, how we enforce our policies or how we keep our students safe,” Ms. Gay stated.

Her assurances did not assuage the House, which handed the subsequent day the DETERRENT Act [Defending Education Transparency and Ending Rogue Regimes Engaging in Nefarious Transactions] with 215 Republican and 31 Democratic votes.

The laws would strengthen Section 117 reporting necessities, together with decreasing the edge on particular person items from $250,000 to $50,000, and eliminating the ground fully for “countries of concern”: China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.

The measure, which now goes to the Senate, additionally would require establishments of upper studying to report such items throughout the identical calendar 12 months. Colleges that fail to take action — a 2019 Senate report discovered that 70% of universities had been out of compliance with Section 117 — would face fines and lack of Title IV funding.

Rep. Michelle Steel, the California Republican who sponsored the invoice with Rep. Virginia Foxx, North Carolina Republican, stated that “there is no such thing as a free lunch.”

“When foreign governments give money to our universities, they don’t do it out of the goodness of their hearts; they want something in return,” Ms. Steel stated. “Whether it’s terror-friendly states like Qatar and Iran, or brutal human rights abusers like the Chinese Communist Party, our campuses must not become puppets of countries who hate America.”

Opposing the laws are 17 higher-education teams led by the American Council on Education, which known as the brand new restrictions “duplicative” and “unnecessary,” declaring that universities have stepped up their reporting since 2018.

The Education Department stated Nov. 21 that “nearly 5,000 additional foreign gifts and contracts transactions valued at nearly $4 billion since ED’s last data release as of Oct. 13, 2023.”

“The largest dollar amounts of gifts and contracts reported to ED between April 6, 2023, and Oct. 13, 2023, were from sources in Germany, Kuwait, Qatar, China, and France,” stated the discover from the Federal Student Aid workplace.